The Trial of Adolf Eichmann

Presented by: Eagle’s Nest Theatre

Venue: Studio One, Northcote Town Hall

Reviewer: Chris Baldock

Date Reviewed: Wednesday 28th October 2009

For those of you unfamiliar with Eagle’s Nest Theatre, they are a fledgling independent theatre company (founded 2006) who bravely produce two plays in repertory approximately three times a year. The plays performed in tandem have a common theme uniting them. It’s a courageous hook but one that seems to be working for them and one that is actually quite clever as it probably gets a good percentage of its audience paying to see both plays. 

The theme for this current season is the Holocaust. Local playwright Neil Cole’s The Trial of Adolf Eichmann is playing with The Trial of God by Eli Wiesel. The Holocaust has a well-worn theatrical path. There are obviously a lot of stories from one of the blackest period in history with incredible stories of humanity and the strength of the human spirit ripe for a powerful night in the theatre. Couple this with cinematic masterpieces (Schindler’s List, Judgement at Nuremburg, the Pianist, Life is Beautiful, The Boy in Striped Pyjamas, The Reader, Sophie’s Choice to name a few) and it may seem that the era’s stories have been exhausted. So it takes a brave playwright to believe they can tell us something new. 

I’m sorry to say for this reviewer, Mr Cole hasn’t succeeded. This production earns the dubious honour of being the first story about the Holocaust that I was not moved by at all. The reasons are many and I will try to explain. 

First off, there’s the play itself. I found very little that was theatrical about it. The dialogue (court scenes aside) was mostly the characters speaking facts thus making a lot of it sound incredibly unnatural and unrealistic. I understand the playwright wanted us to know this information but it was unrelenting, sacrificing character development resulting in this audience member not caring for anyone. I wanted to feel the pain and fear that the Jewish characters went through. It wasn’t enough just to know that they suffered. I already knew that going in! I also wanted to catch at least a glimpse of Eichmann’s psyche so that I could try and understand why he would give the orders to send so many Jews to their deaths. Giving me the facts wasn’t enough. The play needed more heart. It needed more soul.  

I am not aware of the history of this play but I felt it needed some focus in terms of what it wanted to achieve. Maybe its intention was to be a docu-drama. In that case, it achieved its aims slightly more successfully. But even docu-dramas have the potential to be incredibly powerful and moving. This production was missing too many vital elements to make it so. 

However, to be fair, the play was wrapped in a misguided production. The direction was, quite frankly, boring and unimaginative as it rendered the play tedious. Blocking seemed dictated by the very limited lighting rig. As a result, court room scenes were static and there was not enough contrast between various locales. The timing of getting cast on and off was also problematic and clumsy. A case in point – an actor would enter and come downstage centre to deliver dialogue and the rest of the cast would either come on or go off 20 seconds later, making quite a bit of noise, pulling the focus and making dialogue inaudible. This occurred on a couple of occasions. I also lost some dialogue when dramatic music played as the levels between speakers and the actor were not balanced. Strange things like not having liquid of some kind for the cognac or the soup and yet a character being offered real cigarettes flummoxed me. As did the bizarre scene where two characters went to play the violin. The actors froze each time, a light turned red and the sound played was a violin backed by an orchestra. Maybe I missed some sort of symbolism here but I didn’t understand. The ladies next to me were stifling giggles when this occurred so I was reassured that it wasn’t just me. 

The set was very simple and fairly perfunctory with appropriate furniture although I was bothered by the white chairs. I understand that independent companies work on a shoe string budget. But that shouldn’t compromise using some imagination, not to mention style, when presenting an overall vision. Especially when you are charging upward of $27 a ticket. Costuming however was very effective and this may be where the budget was spent.  

The cast overall, with the exception of Michael F Cahill, were somewhat lackluster with a distinct lack of passion, realism, focus or even good old theatricality in most of the performances. Not to mention the fact that the majority of the cast played their role with an off-putting broad Australian accent (Michael is English I believe so had a more neutral tone to his voice which worked) with the exception of Liran Shacher as Kitia who played hers with a thick Polish accent which jarred against the others. It is difficult watching and listening to a Nazi who sounds like they were from Mudgee! Ross Williams who portrayed Eichmann played the role on one level and really looked like he didn’t want to be there. Some played it like they were doing film instead of theatre, particularly the women. And the rest were I’m afraid to say, ineffectual. Only Michael showed fire, attempting to find some depth in his limitedly written roles and created a presence which drew you to him. Many of the actors seemed hesitant and uncertain of some dialogue and moves which made me wonder both how long the rehearsal period was and what they did during them. 

And I need to mention what was, in my mind, an extraordinary moment that I still can’t believe the director allowed. At the end of Act One, I sat there gob-smacked as the scene ended and the actors left the stage in half light so they were clearly seen by the audience and killed any atmosphere they tried to create. If that wasn’t bad enough, the actor playing the SS Officer stayed onstage and proceeded to tell us, out of character, that it was the end of Act One and that there would be an interval, hence destroying any illusion and drama that had just been attempted. People around me shared my “what the?” expression. This strange moment proved to me that some of the people involved did not seem to care to create any sense of pathos or theatricality, thus shooting themselves in their theatrical foot. 

There were two other things I did like (“praise be” I hear you cry). The original music composed by David Howell, although not always used correctly, was still evocative in a few crucial scenes. And I loved the glass eye story. A brief moment but it had a punch. It showed just a glimmer of what the playwright could do if the piece was worked on. 

I make no apologies for not being kinder with this production but the impression I got was that everyone involved was trying to tell a very important story. Which they were. But it doesn’t necessarily mean they were telling it right.

 


A director of over 40 productions and an actor in over 80, Chris is a highly respected director/actor in the "straight" theatre scene with 4 Victorian Drama League Awards, 2 Lyrebird awards and over 30 other theatre awards to his credit. His production of The Laramie Project for Act-o-Matic 3000 at Chapel off Chapel won the Victorian Green Room Award for Best Independent Production as well as making many of the year's "Best" lists and earning a rare 5-star review in The Sunday Age, and his production of Love! Valour! Compassion! for the Midsumma Festival was named by the Herald Sun as one of the best productions of the year. He has also received Music Theatre Guild nominations for performance (The Duke in MUMCo's Big River) and direction (the Victorian première of A Slice of Saturday Night at St Martins). He has been an in-house adjudicator for many theatre companies as well as the Victorian Drama League Awards and the Victorian Music Theatre Guild Awards. He has recently directed Cloudstreet for Heidelberg Theatre Company, The Elephant Man for Malvern Theatre Company and Kindertransport for Williamstown Little Theatre. By day Chris is a manager for a major Ombudsman's scheme.

 

Back To Reviews