Spring Awakening
Presented by: Purely Pensive Productions (PPP)

Venue: Eltham College Performance Centre
Reviewer: Catherine Brain
Date Reviewed: Friday 6th November 2009

 

I was intrigued to make the trek to Eltham to see this production, as it was my first experience of a Purely Pensive Production (PPP). They are a fairly young company, who were established to provide opportunities for young actors to gain experience in non-professional theatre. Definitely something worth supporting!

 

Their selection of script for their year-end production was Spring Awakening by Frank Wedekind– a story that is enjoying a real resurgence, due mostly to the musical adaptation that has been a huge success on Broadway. It tells the story of eight youths in a small town in Germany in the late 1800s, a place described by Wedekind as ‘sexually oppressive’. The play covers some fairly tough content, which is why it is also referred to as ‘a children’s tragedy’. It has had a somewhat controversial history, being censored and banned in productions around the world for its dark content. Each of the youths has burning questions and secret desires, and is challenged by authority figures who are trying to stifle their curiosity; religious leaders, teachers and parents.

 

Although the pairing of PPP with a show about the struggle of a group of youths may seem like a logical pairing, there was a real disconnect for me between the intent of the production and the overall execution.

 

I should admit upfront that I have found it difficult to approach this review. On the one hand, I commend the team at PPP for tackling such a challenging piece as Spring Awakening, and I honestly believe that each member of the team (both on and off stage) was committed to making the production a success. On the other hand, I was incredibly frustrated by the basic elements of stagecraft that were ignored by the production team, the clunky and inconsistent adaptation of the script and the almost pantomime-like portrayal of the majority of the characters during some very bleak and adult issues. For a script that deals with such confronting issues as sexual abuse, drugs and alcohol, abortion and suicide, I was amazed that I felt absolutely nothing for the plight of the eight young characters at the conclusion of the play. Key moments were wasted, important turning points were trivialised and dramatic monologues became very self-indulgent.

 

Shane Sanfilippo and Jeremy Ives have adapted Frank Wedekind’s original script in an attempt to “simplify the dialogue, focus on character development and stay true to the themes of the play.” From my perspective, this adaptation didn’t quite achieve this – instead, it made some of the dialogue too simple, informal and modern which took away some of the complexities of the characters that serve to make the story so compelling. It was hard to believe that the youths were fighting free from such a rigid and controlling environment when some of their language and interactions were just the opposite. I think the adaptation also weakened some of the power of the authority figures that Wedekind created.

 

This inconsistency was evident in other aspects of the production, in particular the overall design. Characters appeared to come from several different time periods in their appearance (costume and make-up) and their demeanour which I found unnecessary. I appreciate that many non-professional companies have to ‘beg, borrow and steal’ sometimes to pull together props and costumes for a show, but the overall effect was confusing. Both of the mothers on stage were dressed in relatively modern attire, which seemed totally out of place. Use of props / set pieces to create the different spaces was for the most part effective, but I think the size of the space was too big for the piece. Using all three of the curtained sections in the space was unnecessary – I would have liked to have seen a more intimate space created for the ensemble for this piece. It really would have helped to create that sense of feeling closed in and oppressed by their environment.

 

Key elements of the production were a major let down on the night I saw the performance. The lighting design was inconsistent, with several pockets of poorly lit space on the stage which were used too often by the cast to ignore. The execution of the lighting was confusing, with lighting rises and falls for no apparent reason in the middle of scenes, which served as another distraction for the audience. I was incredibly frustrated by the amount of backstage noise that was apparent during the production and some of the clumsy moves by the crew – it also distracted several of the cast on stage. I was aghast when at the death of Wendla, her grieving mother was interrupted by a crew member and a curtain change in full light. It made no sense and killed any potential connection the audience had with what was unfolding on stage.

 

The production was under the direction of Shane Sanfilippo, who was also responsible for the adaptation (and a range of other production roles). Shane comes to this role with some experience in direction, so I was a little disappointed with his approach here. As I have highlighted already, there were several basic elements of good stagecraft that were ignored or perhaps intentionally used. Regardless, they were distracting to the audience. There was a great deal of pantomime-like acting with characters engaging the audience directly and ignoring the person on stage with whom they were supposed to be conversing with. Given some of the extremely intimate and personal conversations, this felt odd. The placement of the cast on stage didn’t seem to be thought out in parts. The best example was when all of the youths came across each other in the woods, and formed a line next to each other…each stepping forward to deliver their lines. So much for a group of people breaking free from authority! Too many of the cast delivered crucial lines in the dark, unable to find their light which should have been addressed. Several of the younger cast were trying to be too ‘child-like’ in their portrayal, and came off as one-dimensional characters that just weren’t believable in what they were experiencing. In contrast, none of the adults were entirely believable as authority figures. Again, I see the adaptation as having a role in this, but believe the director had a responsibility to bring it together and make the piece more cohesive.

 

The cast assembled were enthusiastic and experienced in a range of smaller productions. There were some interactions within the ensemble that worked well, but I don’t believe there was a genuine connection between members of the ensemble as characters. The single stand-out performance for me was Erin Brass’s portrayal of Martha Bessell. I thought her performance was honest and child-like, without being overly simple. She also avoided the temptation to go too melodramatic, which allowed the audience to really connect with her and feel for her situation.  She was subtle and entirely believable as the young Martha, who was the victim of serious abuse by her father.

 

Special mention to Ashley McPherson as Melchior. I found his performance one of the more engaging during the first Act, but I wasn’t convinced by his descent into madness towards the conclusion of the play. I also wanted to commend Mark Kearny (Hans) and Nicholas Zull (Ernst) for their commitment to their characters…despite the incessant giggles from the audience in the lead up to their kiss.

 

Again, I commend the cast and crew for tackling Spring Awakening, and hope that the team at Purely Pensive Productions continue to provide opportunities for young performers to gain more experience in all aspects of production.

 


 

Back To Reviews